Talk:SMS Königsberg (1915)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 14:53, 26 October 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Link to 88mm flak gun article, sister/sister ship. Mines is duplicated.
Links added - as far as I can tell, naval mine is only linked once. Parsecboy (talk) 19:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, my fault; I should have said that mines appear twice in the infobox.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, fixed now. Parsecboy (talk) 20:09, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Is a picture available?
Added a photo of Karlsruhe
Overall:
Pass or Fail: